In this task I was able to
see how different social groups are represented in films. I feel that this is a
very important image to get right in the opening sequence. It also allowed me
to see how certain films portrayed youths in various ways, however they are
normally portrayed negatively even if it is in a comical way. In 21 Jump Street
you can see how two very different characters are portrayed. However they also
make sure that they are relatable in some way, such are their gender and the
way they dress. This can also include the way they are feeling at the end of
the opening sequence. Youths are represented in a very different way in the
opening sequence of Kidulthood, as it is very dramatic rather than comical.
They are shown to be uneducated and only really care about status and social
commitments. This can show where they are from and what their social groups are
like.
I believe that the elects
that make up the representation of youth (mine-en-scene, sound, editing and
camera angles) are important. This is because it can show the audience what is
going on from a range of perspectives and what each social group looks like.
These elements also link to the narrative of the film.
During
this task I was asked to film and edit a character opening a
door, crossing the room and sitting down in a chair opposite another chair, and
then exchange a couple of lines of dialogue. It had to include match on
action shot, 180-degree rule and a reverse shot.
Match on
Action Shot: is and
editing technique used to link shots together. This is where movement is
continued form one shot to the other.
Reverse Shot:
is used to
show convocation between two characters. It starts off by showing one
character in the first shot and the character they are talking to in
the next shot.
180 Degree
Rule: is a rule when filming.
It means that the camera cannot pass 180 degrees when filming the action;
otherwise it may be confusing for the audience.
Learning Comment:
I really enjoyed this
task because it gave me a chance to work with the camera and attempt to
edit. However as I used my phone to film this task rather than
a camera which has some limitations. When filming on an iPhone,
you don't get as good a quality of image, sound and stability as
you can't use a tripod as easily. However it is really easy to use
and you can edit it on there as well, if you have iMovie, although it may not
be as good a quality.
I also made a mistake
when filming as you can film both landscape and portrait; this makes it easy to
make mistakes. This is because on a camera it is harder to
film portrait. At the start I filmed it portrait rather
than landscape. This is why there are black frames at the start. iPhones also
crop images which means you don't get the whole picture.
I don't feel
like I will use my phone to edit again as it was not as easy as editing on a
computer. However it did like how portable it was.
I also learnt how
important it was to plan what was going t happen before hand. This is because
it makes it easier to see what needed to happen. However I found that it
was hard to visualise at first but once you got going and stated filming it was
easier to see where you were going and what may need changing.
I also feel that the
actors I case were very professional, as I didn't have much raw footage and
also were able to get most shots complete in one take.
I like this opening
sequence because they clearly displayed the narrative and genre of the film.
Even though there wasn't much dialogue the camera angle and narrative kept the
audience engaged. The mise-en-scene was also good in this film as it helped
define the social group of the characters, who seem to be young youths. The
dress code would suggest that they are chavs, however this could just be
because of where they live and what they are doing.
Another reason I like the
narrative is because of how they introduced the narrative to the audience. It
is fast-paced and full of drama. Even though they haven't clarified what is
going on It leaves the audience with a feeling of curiosity, which makes them
continue watching.
The Actors used were able
to fulfill their roles well. It was also clear who the main character was, from
the way in which they used camera angles and specific shots.
Even through there wasn’t
much dialogue, from what they used it helped to set the narrative and build the
tension in the atmosphere. They also chose good music for the opening sequence,
as it suited the genre and helped to build tension, which kept the audience
interested. The realised when it was needed to have moments of silent and when
they needed to increase the sound
The camera angles used were
also really good as it showed the setting and character really well. I like the
way that they used a panning sot to show where the opening sequence would take
place. i also liked how they had some moving shots and some still shots. This
helped make the piece more diverse. The uses a very good technique when
introducing the character as it linked with the narrative and gave you an
insight in to the gene of the film.
However some of the shots
were a bit shaky, which made it hard to focus on what was going on.
They also didn't show s
specific social group and could tell what sort of people the film would be
focusing on.
Overall I would give this
opening sequence an A grade. This is because of the professional quality of the
editing and filming. Along with the good connection the narrative, choice of
actors and genre.
Captive
This opening sequence was
good for many reasons. To start with it included the BBFC at the start, this
give it a more professional feel as it is used in industry practice. They
also included a short animation of the production company, "Blood Orange
Productions". They use sound to create the effect of the words being
written.
They also use non-diegetic
sound when the opening sequence starts, which helps to build tension and
creates a creepy and intense atmosphere. This includes dripping sound in the background
and the typical soundtracks used to create tension in a film. It is very
effective how the typography moves on the screen. This helps draw the
audience’s attention to the information and also build the atmosphere. It links
well to the genre of the film because of this and due to the fact that the text
is bold, clear and looks as though it has been typed on a typewriter. This could
link to the film because from what has been gathered so far, it seems to be a
thriller / crime drama and the font used for the typography is often linked to
police reports. The font also could signal distress, along with the movement of
the typography.
The use of camera angles is
also good at this point because it is showing the audience close up images of
the surroundings. There was a good variation of camera angles, from close
up to wide shot. it shows the audience how the character is feeling and
what is going on form a variety of angles. The shots, which are close up,
let the audience see detail and make the film more intense to watch. When
they use wide angles it lets the audience see the bigger picture and start to
build up an idea about what is going on. It focuses on a person,
covered in blood and who looks weak from a brutal beating, whom we can only
assume is the main character. The use of mise-en-scene is effective here as it
links to the genre of the film. The mise-en-scene is also useful to help show
who the target audience are. A security camera is also shown, linking with the
genre and narrative. It also shows the different angles of what is happening to
the main character. I also feel that they have edited this very well as they
have used good techniques for this, such as when they make they security
cameras break which suits the genre of the film.
The use of sound is also
good at this part of the film. The original sounds are continued throughout the
opening sequence, but the music gradually grows in volume, which creates
suspense. It is also used to build apprehension and drama in the opening
sequence. The music used is also very melodramatic.
The Narrative is not
revealed automatically in this film, however there seem to reveal parts of the
film in almost flash back but they are jumpy and distorted, linking to the
style used in the film. On the other hand the opening sequence doesn’t reveal much
in the way of narrative but remains very mysterious. This makes the audience
want to continue watching the film to find out what happens to the character
that has been introduced and how he ended up in this situation. This is called
the enigma theory, which helps to engage the audience.
There isn't a very specific
social group in this opening sequence. Although, judging from the age of the
actor, you could guess that this film is based around the live of teenagers.
The character also doesn't seem to be from a specific social group as the
clothes he is wearing don't stand out as they seem normal and everyday,
compared to some social groups such as Goths who dress in black.
I like the opening sequence
as it reveals the narrative just enough to keep the audience interested and
seems to have an interesting narrative. I also like the use of
mise-en-scene in the film as it helps to reveal the genre and develop the audiences’
interest in the film. The mise-en-scene is also good for setting the scene and builds
up ideas about the film. However I am not a big fan of the genre they have
picked for this film and feel that they could have been more specific about the
social groups in the film. Overall I would watch the rest of the film.
Overall I would give this
opening sequence an A grade as believe that it has a good variety of camera
angles and makes good use of the mise-en-scene. They have also chosen a font
for the typography which links to the narrative and genre of the film.
Karma
I don't like this opening
sequence very much. This is because I didn't find it very engaging or enjoyable
to watch. I also didn't believe that the acting was very good and could
possibly have chosen better actors for the sequence. This is because they are
laughing when they are supposed to sad that their friend has died. There
is also a lot of shaky camera work, which is annoying to watch, as you can't
get a clear picture of what is going on. Some of the frames are also held for
too long and in one you can actually see the cameras reflection due to the lack
of natural lighting. There are also some scene which are confusing for the
audience to understand and don't seem that relevant to the film. The
non-diegetic music is good for showing the main character is feeling but there
is no dialogue what so ever. The music is not compatible with
the entire opening sequence. This could be improved because then you
get a true insight into what is going on. The narrative is also pretty boring
to watch along with the styles of editing. They also don't make use of the
typography and don't introduce all the production people. They typography also
doesn't link to they film and is not displayed in a very interesting way.
On the other hand there are
some good part of the opening sequence. It has a very strong connection with
the narrative throughout the opening and the narrative is also clear from the
begging. They have also made it easy to see who the target audience is,
teenagers. This is due to the age of actors and dress code. The social groups,
which are clearly shown in this opening, are the outcasts and chavs (bullies).
This is a very strong topic, which has affected lots of people in their lifetime.
They also use a range of camera angles, which show diversity and the narrative
from a different perspective. However they are not effective as they could have
been, due to the jumpy editing. It is also good at introducing the main
characters and secondary characters. There is a clear distinction between the
two and it is also successful at establishing their relationship, linking
to the narrative.
They also have a good
opening scene, where you see someone climbing up onto a chair and look at a
noose. This links with the narrative and demonstrates to the audience how the
character is feeling. This is effective as it makes the audience feel as though
they are connected to the character.
Overall I feel that this
opening sequence deserves a C. this is due to the poor use of editing, seeing
as they repeated a shot which could have been fixed and the majority of it was
jumpy. They also used a poor range of actors and boring typography, which
didn't really link to the narrative.
Roses Are Red
I like this opening sequence,
as it is very different from the others. It uses a lot of high key
lighting and has an interesting way of showing who helped make the film. It is
also interesting because showing a characters room you get to know them better.
This is because a person’s room is very personal and intimate. This also helps
to define the target audience, in this case teenage girls. This is due to the
fact that the main protagonist is a girl and spends a lot of time getting ready
in the morning.
The music is also helpful
to the opening sequence as it helps to define the genre of the film. It is once
again non-diegetic. There is also no speech in this opening sequence and you
can only get to know the character through the mist-en-scene.
They must have also spent a
lot of time explaining what was going to happen and how they were going to film
this. Although some of the filming was shaky, making it hard to focus.
However some of the editing
techniques were slightly jilted in the transitions, but in the whole I think
that the editing was really well done.
Overall I feel like this
opening sequence deserves a B grade. This is because the original ideas and
good insight into the characters life. I also think is deserves this grade
because of the link between the music, narrative and genre. However I feel that
they could have brought more of the narrative into the opening sequence.